As attorneys, we tend to assess the strength of our cases based on objective information, but not on the system of support that elucidates that information. Despite television dramas that portray an attorney as the sole determinant of a case, we know better than anyone else that, before a case reaches court, numerous individuals working in different capacities can make or break its quality, one of them being a court reporter. As all lawyers realize, in the end, the success of certain lawsuits is decided by the quality of depositions. But although lawyers scrupulously analyze depositions, they rarely review reporters’ credentials for deposition. In most cases, the prosecutors are too distracted to question a writer in litigation as though they were questioning a victim. Yet there is a way for attorneys to pick the right reporters without needing to prosecute them: to call a credible court news service. Below, we mention three facets of the selection method for reporters that identify a credible news service.Find expert advice about Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters of West Palm Beach-Court Reporting read here.
Certified court coverage is focused on getting the work correct certifications. However, anyone who has had a bad experience with a certified reporter can attest that the value of a reporter depends on more than its certifications. One way to assess the credibility of a reporter outside certifications is by reviewing sources rigorously, especially those not mentioned. A reporter’s mentioned sources must be checked by any accredited court reporting service. But the best agencies also ask for multiple references not listed in a reporter’s resume. By reviewing a broad variety of sources, a news organization may assess that only a few commendable investigative tasks have been carried out by a writer or have a true reputation for excellence.
Professional Capacity Screening
As with most occupations, court reporting is increasingly being defined by technical practices , especially real-time reporting and video reporting. If you require these abilities in a reporter, you won’t find reporters who possess them hard to locate. But you may have difficulty discerning how skilled a reporter is in your specific reporting needs. Just as some lawyers take on cases they don’t specialize in, some reporters take on assignments that they aren’t skilled in reporting. To avoid these reporters, always hire through a reporting agency that is actually testing the abilities of their reporters rather than judging their abilities by their certifications.
It might sound strange that court reporters are to be screened based on personality. After all, court reporters are generally silent during their assignments, and sedentary. But the personality of court reporters has more to do with how they present themselves during depositions; it also has to do with how they react to deponents in terms of the manuscript of deposition. A reporter who is easily distracted, prejudiced or violently responds to other topics may create a text which is inaccurate or deeply defective in terms of the nonverbal reactions of the deponent. Again, some agencies that report court rely on credentials from a reporter. But a reporting agency which values its customers deeply will screen its reporters based on personality.